Jun 29 <\/p>\n
Written By <\/a> <\/p>\n Where the government is involved in creating opportunity for a citizen to commit a crime, once a citizen is charged with the crime, he or she may be entitled to assert the affirmative defense of entrapment. In West Virginia, the defense of entrapment depends heavily upon the facts and the extent of the government\u2019s involvement. If you were charged with a crime, you should promptly consult with a criminal defense<\/a> attorney. This blog discussed the defense of entrapment. <\/p>\n Generally, courts throughout the nation have adopted two tests to determine whether an entrapment defense is permissible. The first test, adopted by the majority of jurisdictions, is referred to as the \u201corigin of intent\u201d test. This test is a subjective test and is typically considered by a jury. Under the \u201corigin of intent\u201d test, the question is whether the original intent to commit the crime was created by governmental activity as opposed to the defendant. To find entrapment under this test, the government must have induced the defendant to commit the crime and the defendant must not have been predisposed to commit the crime.The second test to determine used whether an entrapment defense is permissible is referred to as the \u201cpolice conduct\u201d theory. This test has been adopted by a minority of jurisdictions. This test is an objective test typically considered by the court. To find entrapment under the \u201cpolice conduct\u201d theory, the consideration is whether the government\u2019s conduct would likely induce a normally law-abiding citizen to commit the offense. <\/p>\n In West Virginia, courts utilize the subjective \u201corigin of intent\u201d test. It is the defendant\u2019s burden to offer some evidence that he or she was induced by the government to commit the crime. Once some evidence is offered, the burden is then placed on the prosecutor to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant was predisposed to commit the alleged crime. Importantly, where the government\u2019s conduct is egregious and reprehensible, a defendant may raise a separate argument, distinct from the entrapment defense. Outrageous government conduct may violate the due process clause of both the West Virginia<\/a> and United States<\/a> Constitutions. If outrageous government conduct is proven, the State may be barred from any prosecution related to the government\u2019s misconduct. <\/p>\n The defense of entrapment requires a detailed analysis of the facts. To determine whether the defense is viable, one must examine the government\u2019s conduct and the defendant\u2019s predisposition. An experienced criminal defense attorney<\/a> will apply the facts of the case to the laws of West Virginia. Barney Law PLLC provides criminal defense<\/a> to citizens charged with crimes in Putnam County, Kanawha County, and surrounding areas.<\/p>\n Criminal Defense<\/a> Entrapment<\/a> <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.playground.setmy.site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Bowling-Pin-750x380-1.webp\")
<\/p>\nWhat is Entrapment?<\/h4>\n
The Entrapment Defense in West Virginia<\/h4>\n
Defending Allegations of Criminal Conduct<\/h4>\n